Talk:Albert Bumgardner/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 14:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Will be reviewing this in a few days! Arconning (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Generalissima Here 'ya go! Arconning (talk) 12:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Arconning: Added an image! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Prose and MoS
[edit]Lead and infobox
[edit]- I personally don't see any issues.
Early life and education
[edit]- No issues.
Career
[edit]- No issues.
Civic and organizational work
[edit]- No issues.
Later life
[edit]- I mean it's short, could it be integrated to another section? Though, I don't have any issues if it can't be integrated.
Works
[edit]- Does Seattle have to be wikilinked again, alongside with other repeating wikilinked places?
- Seattle is only linked once in the lede and once in the body as per MOS (and in the table, but its standard practice to repeat links there) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Media
[edit]- I don't see any media right now but it would be nice if you could use a fair use image of him! :)
Refs
[edit]- All sources seem good, sourcechecked and good to go.
- Earwig picks up nothing substantial.
Misc
[edit]- No ongoing edit war, focused and broad info, neutral.
Good Article review progress box
|
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.