Talk:Alley Pond Park/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 21:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
[edit]3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
6. Illustrations ✓ Pass
7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass
Comments
[edit]1.
- Link Little Neck Bay at the first mention in the prose
- Done
- "as authorized by a resolution of the New York City Board of Estimate in 1927" - The Board of Estimate isn't mentioned in the prose
- Done
- "At 655.3 acres (265.2 ha), Alley Pond Park is the second-largest public park in New York City behind Flushing Meadows–Corona Park, and the ninth-largest public park in the city." - I'm not quite understanding what the distinction between the two statistics is.
- Oops, the first one was supposed to be Queens. epicgenius (talk) 23:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Link Batting cage
- Done
2.
- I'm highly confused as to why many of the New York Parks and Rec Department refs have "June 16, 1939" as the publishing date, when they're online sources. There's several like that, and I honestly have no idea where that date is coming from.
- Ref 40 has "Welcome to NYC.gov" as the publisher, but it almost seems like to me that "Archives of the Mayor's Press Office" would be a better publisher
- Done
- Ref 26 the publisher should be "New York City Department of Parks & Recreation"
- Done
- Ref 43 lacks the author
- Kandinsky needs the publishing location
- Done
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
It's in pretty good shape, placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 22:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: Thanks, I have done all of these. epicgenius (talk) 23:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.