Talk:Alternative Egyptology

Copyedit[edit]

I've added a copyedit tag to this article again. Currently, no less than 8 sentences start with the words "Alternative Egyptology", making the article seem clumsy and repetitive. Robotman ¹⁹⁷⁴ 20:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete or redirect[edit]

this is obviously fringecruft. If there is genuine academioc debate, it's a bona fide part of Egyptology proper (Glasgow Chronology). If there isn't, it's just kookery. This seems to be a lame attempt to boost the "credibility" of fringe literature (or crackpot webpages, as the case may be). dab (𒁳) 18:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected some time ago. -- Secisek (talk) 03:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]