Talk:Amanita onusta/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (talk) 03:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

This mushroom sort of looks like it would be poisonous... that, or a mushroom creature from outer space ; I'd say the same about S. spraguei if it didn't look like a package of crab delights. heh. Anyway, about this article; in taxonomy define the term 'stirps'.-- Rcej (talk) 03:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, have wiktionary-linked stirps, and also linked section. Sasata (talk) 05:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go. I know we're going through these quick; but they usually are pretty ga ready from the start, so there's not a lot to fiddle with.-- Rcej (talk) 01:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've been trying to make my submissions as GA-clean as possible, to entice reviewers to pick them up faster... it mostly hasn't worked :) But thank you once again for ending my lonely days at the GAN queue. Sasata (talk) 02:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Amanita onusta passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass