Talk:Amazon (Dragon's Crown)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 18:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article.Tintor2 (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks well. The parts that kinda seem unnecessary are:

The infobox does not need references as long as the body has such information.
"Several figures of the Amazon have also been released, such as a 1/7th scale figure by Excellent Model,[19] another figure by XPLUS,[20] and another by Goodsmile as part of their Parfom line.[21]" Unlike the other merchandising, there is nothing unusual here. It's common that every video game character has merchandising so I suggest merging the notable merchandising with the reception or other section.
Most sources heavily focus on the character and appear to be reliable. I heard issues about Kotaku recently but the content is not informal.

That's all. Ping me when you think everything is okay.Tintor2 (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've had people bring up issues with creators/designers voice actors needing to be referenced, especially as articles age and people try to add "helpful" bits (one particular example in regards to this, there's someone *assumed* to be the character's english voice actor, but neither she nor other reference has confirmed that. However multiple sites claim it)

I kept the promotion section separate because of the second paragraph: the reactions to that one figure tie directly into how her design was received (the Siliconera and SoraNews24 refs specifically), and would be out of place if combined into one paragraph. I hope these reasonings suffice.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Passing review.Tintor2 (talk) 00:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]