Talk:Anatosuchus
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just a skull?
[edit]How can one infer the entire skeletal structure as depicted in the drawings? Thanks. 67.243.2.44 (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- As you can see in the taxobox image, more than a skull is known. FunkMonk (talk) 20:48, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Did you notice?
[edit]It's the crocoduck in reverse. xD--Draco ignoramus sophomoricus (talk) 00:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm tempted to put a link to crocoduck in the article... Totnesmartin (talk) 20:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Oh the irony of it all
[edit]2003 creationist been using crocoduck to disprove evolution when in 2009 this genuine 'crocoduck' was discovered.204.112.154.184 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC).
- this fossil was found in 2003, not 2009, the crocoduck meme is from 2007. 2804:6A00:F017:2200:F0D4:809F:7DC5:4B06 (talk) 19:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- C-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles
- Mid-importance Palaeontology articles
- C-Class Palaeontology articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles