Jump to content

Talk:And the Rest Is Drag/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 18:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 19:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting this daily from now on. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking time to review! Happy to address any concerns ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Well-written

[edit]

A pleasant read with a lot of personality! Some nit-picks:

  • her relationship with her father and his death — "her relationship with [...] his death" is a bit odd, perhaps: "with her late father", or, later on: "and her feelings about his death".
  • vaguely shares — perhaps something like, "alludes", to remove any possible negative connotation.
  • (featuring Clairy Browne) — this would seem useful on the song's first mention, unless I am missing something.
  • Violet Chachki says her look — I initially thought she was referencing Davenport's outfit.

Verifiable with no original research

[edit]

A lot of good sources! Looking at the ones of unknown reliability, their about pages, publishers, and what they cite, seem satisfactory. This is a bit silly from WERRRK.com, but yes, they were selected for archive by the Library of Congress, and WP:PLOTCITE also partially applies.

Spot-check

[edit]
  • Carpentier, Megan; Rushe, Dominic (2015-05-19). "RuPaul's Drag Race recap: season seven, episode 12 – And the Rest is Drag". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. OCLC 60623878. Archived from the original on 2020-03-22. Retrieved 2024-02-01.</ref>
    • Looks good Green tickY
  • Boulet, Ruth (2015-05-19). "RuPaul's Drag Race Season 7 episode 12 recap: Born Naked video". Channel Guide Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-03-01. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
    • Looks good Green tickY
  • Libby, Katie. ""RuPaul's Drag Race" Season 7, Episode 12: And the Rest is a Drag". CITY Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-02-24. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
    • Looks good Green tickY
  • "RuPaul's Drag Race: "And The Rest Is Drag"". The A.V. Club. G/O Media. 2015-05-19. Archived from the original on 2021-06-20. Retrieved 2024-02-01.
    • Looks good Green tickY
  • "'RuPaul's Drag Race' recap: 'And the Rest Is a Drag!'". Entertainment Weekly. Dotdash Meredith. ISSN 1049-0434. OCLC 21114137. Archived from the original on 2023-05-29. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
    • I'll be lenient towards the "guest judge" and "special guest", but perhaps find a ref for the Emmy, as it's outside the Drag Race franchise. Looks good otherwise.
  • "11 Times "RuPaul's Drag Race" Celebrated The Trans Community". Logo TV. Archived from the original on 2023-11-29. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
    • Looks good alongside the other ref. Green tickY
  • Ehrman-Dupre, Joe (2015-05-20). "'RuPaul's Drag Race' Recap: Season 7, Episode 12: 'And The Rest Is Drag'". IndieWire. Penske Media Corporation. Archived from the original on 2024-03-03. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
    • Looks good Green tickY

Broad in its coverage

[edit]

Many hits on Google Scholar and TWL, but upon checking, none of them discuss the episode in any detail, it just seems to be a catchy tagline. Looking through news articles and websites, I can safely say that this article is quite broad.

  • I agree that it's an overall benefit, but the 110 words of background on Cameron is a bit distracting. Perhaps the list of episodes could be summarized.
  • Could you clarify The Guardian's stance on Pearl's and Chachki's outfits? It seems to be positive considering statements like: "...give people a reason to root for you other than the fact that [you wear] corsets tighter than Miss Scarlett herself", and "...so I, like Michelle Visage, applaud [...] all efforts to channel Madonna (now two weeks running!)." Whatever you think works best!
    • Also, to segue from their shady first statement about Chachki, would any of their commentary on the contestants' personas, relationships, or exit interviews be worth a mention? Some of it isn't too tied to the episode as a whole, but I'd be interested in your opinion.

Neutral

[edit]

Neutral as can be, seemingly no issues.

Stable

[edit]

One revert over due weight and a recent AFD with rough consensus to keep; no major, outstanding issues.

Illustrated

[edit]

Images are CC licensed from Flickr, own works, VRT confirmed, or public domain. They are quite lovely, I like the Madonna and Sally Bowles pictures for reference. However:

Summary

[edit]

@Another Believer: Some starters for now; my other thoughts may be more extensive. Thank you for your continued patience! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Averageuntitleduser: I've tried to address your concerns. You'll notice I just created a subsection for Fashion under Production, to follow-up on some of my above comments. Please let me know if any concerns remain. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I like the sectioning! One teeny source thing. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Averageuntitleduser Thanks! I've added a citation by the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lovely work! Thanks for sticking with me, I'm now happy to pass this article! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.