Talk:Anju and Kafei/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 07:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Soon. λ NegativeMP1 07:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Quick criteria

• Article seems close to meeting the GA criteria.
• Article doesn't appear to contain copyright violations, with the only things appearing to be false positives.
• No cleanup banners or in-line tags.
• No previous GA review to take into account as the article is brand new.

Review

• "Like all content in Majora's Mask, the quest is on a time limit and spans all three days in the game that take place before the moon crashes, destroying the land of Termina." change this to "Like all content in Majora's Mask, the quest is on a time limit and spans all three days in the game that take place before the moon crashes into Termina, destroying it." as it would read better in my opinion.

  I elected to change it to "the world" as I think "it" may not fully convey what "it" is.

• Link to Majora's Mask 3D in the lead, since it has its own article.

  Linked

• "Aonuma noted that their sidequest could be complicated" How exactly was it complicated?

  Clarified

• Any establishment that Daniel Starkey is a reliable author? WP:VG/S lists Destructoid as only being usable if the author can be established as reliable.

  VG:RS/S seems to be discussing an issue of Destructoid writers who produce low-quality content, while still acknowledging that the site may have merit. Starkey is a member of staff, and looking at his output, none of the articles he writes would qualify as low-quality content, which would implicitly put him in the greylist at least (a concept established in the most recent discussion).

  • I'll let it slide here since the pieces are very substantial and not low quality lists, but if this article for whatever reason goes to FAC, strongly consider looking for higher quality sourcing than Valnet properties.
• Spotchecked references 3, 4, and 12. All verify the article content.

Putting this on hold to give you time to address the issues. λ NegativeMP1 18:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Alright, this looks fine. Pass. λ NegativeMP1 22:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.