Talk:Anoxic depolarization in the brain/Georgia Institute of Technology Introduction to Neuroscience

Peer Review from Bennettalterman (talk) 05:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Bennett Alterman

---

1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1 (No course banner)
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding: 2

_______________

Total: 19 out of 20

Thanks for catching that. I will definitely put the coourse banner Adewale3 (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

1. Quality of Information: 2 2. Article size: 2 3. Readability: 2 4. Refs: 2 5. Links: 2 6. Responsive to comments: 2 7. Formatting: 2 8. Writing: 2 9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2 10. Outstanding?: 1

Total 19/20 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roanukz (talk • contribs) 14:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review from Kelli Allen

1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2--Well segmented into difference sections. Dense writing but made more accessible.
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1--Extra free lines from the top portion should be removed.
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding: 1

_______________

Total: 18 out of 20 Kallen35 (talk) 21:43, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I will narrow the line. THANKS Adewale3 (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)