Talk:Antimonumento 5J/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 21:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

@Tbhotch Here are my comments. :) Arconning (talk) 13:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

• protests of 4, 5, The artwork was installed on 5 June 2023, authorities removed the sculpture, add a comma at the end.
• monument be reinstalled,, add to after monument.
• Optional. Citation in the lead is alright but if you could mention it in the body and remove the citation in the lead, that would be alright.

• Removed. It was for the DYK.

Background

•  Giovanni died of head trauma from a blunt object, , remove comma.
• Mex$, US$, link to the denominations.

• Somebody once told me that money would fall into WP:OVERLINK

• According to the family, they refused the payment,, After Floyd's murder,, remove comma.
• The video became viral,, change became to went, and remove the comma.
• who were reported as forcibly disappeared., replace as to to have.
• "El Halconazo" , add a comma at the end.

History and installation

• on the opposite side of the State Government Palace, add a comma at the end.
• another anti-monument, add was at the end.
• Giovanni's case was not isolated and, add that at the end.
• the lights in the plaza were turned off, add a comma at the end.

Replica and ordered reinstallation

• for installation was submitted , add a comma at the end.
• consult with the state civil protection, remove the.
• Firefighters rejected the reinstallation, add a comma at the end.
• and that (being made of steel) it could cause electric problems,, remove comma.
• is one meter shorter, convert to imperial system as well.

Images

• All have proper licenses, just be careful on the second to last one.

Refs

• Random reference check: 1, 8, 15, 19, 27, good!
• Earwig and manual check seems great.

Misc

• No ongoing edit war, broad and focused information about the background of the topic and the topic itself, neutral.

• @Arconning: Thanks for the review, I have completed most of the concerns. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed