Talk:Antiptosis

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clarify

"This form of antiptosisis related to the technique hendiadys; it is more or less the opposite of it. It is also related to the technique hypallage, except the governing noun becomes the adjective instead of the noun in regimen."

The hypallage explanation should be clarified.

1) It is not clear where the governing noun and the noun in regimen are -- in the antiptosis or in the hypallage?

2) Also, "noun in regimen" means "governing noun", so are these the same noun?

3) Finally, "noun in regimen" is an obscure phrase, well worth learning but not in online dictionaries or Wikipedia. Google yielded a nice explanation of "in regimen" at https://books.google.ch/books?id=I807AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA32&lpg=PA32&dq=%22in+regimen%22+grammar&source=bl&ots=tiWTbK9ken&sig=ACfU3U1DOJq9iHJro3Eh49FDcon61rYrIQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjhpqCa3pD4AhWDGuwKHRKBBAoQ6AF6BAgdEAM#v=onepage&q=%22in%20regimen%22%20grammar&f=false. Namely "A Comprehensive Hebrew Grammar, Wherein the Principles of the Language are Simply And Briefly Explained", by George Jones, p. 32. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:171B:2274:7C21:90DB:71F3:AA4D:E9DC (talk) 07:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]