Talk:ApertusVR

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because this version was the original article, which describes ApertusVR the best. This is my first Wikipedia article and I wanted to put more internal links, but the article was edited as: "Speedy deletion declined. Criterion A1 does not apply: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article"

I don't agree with it because:

- the features paragraph described well ApertusVR's features, while the first three lines don't.
- the architecture paragraph described more details about ApertusVR architecture, while the first three lines don't.
- the application paragraph described the application of ApertusVR, while the first three lines do not at all.

I understand, that I have to insert links to internal Wikipedia pages, but why did you / others mark the article for deletion? I think it's not reasonable. As you can see A-Frame Wiki page, there is also History, Benefits, Usage paragraphs... Why did you say that our "Application" paragraph is not equivalent to A-Frame's "Benefits" paragraph?

Thanks & Regards,

Akos Hamori