Talk:Apollo 13 (film)/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 03:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I like this movie. I will be doing the review. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist[edit]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Within definition. A bit of vandalism 2 weeks ago, but that and its reversions are allowed per GAC
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. See below
7. Overall assessment. Pending

Comments[edit]

Before the review
  • Several citation needed, clean-up tags, and other miscellanea which need to be addressed.
  • Plot is a little too long. Minus the lead, the article is 15800 characters of readable prose. The plot takes up 4,271 of that, or approximately 27% of the article.
6B

Summary: Quick-fail. Huge clean-up template in the Technical and historical accuracy section that has been there since July 2009 and yet to be addressed. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]