Talk:Archaeoastronomy/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 09:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: Three found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: One found and tagged.[2] Jezhotwells (talk) 10:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall now read the article thoroughly and post a review here within the next twenty-four hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Ref# 81 is a dead link. I can't find any manuals on the Brunton web site.Done- Fixed with Internet Archive / Alun Salt (talk) 15:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good, that didn't work for me. Results from the Ia are sometimes inconsistent. All other references are RS, assume good faith for off-line sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed with Internet Archive / Alun Salt (talk) 15:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Thorough, without going into unnecessary micro-detail.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Captioned and licensed appropriately
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- An interesting and well written article. I am happy to list this as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: