Talk:Ashe (Overwatch)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 09:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
Lead
- Should clarify details about the Deadlock gang in the body of the article - particularly mentioning that it was formed as an arms-dealing gang and that it's based out of Arizona.
- Fixed. Removed the Arizona bit too, it didn't add anything.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Concept and development
- Is Blizzplanet an appropriate source?
- It's had direct dealing with Blizzard Entertainment in the past, and I also linked to a recording of the panel itself on Web Archive for each citation.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Design
- "Two notable skins include "Mobster" and "Safari"" Is this a pair of skins, or just skins for Ashe that have an accompanying B.O.B. costume?
- Fixed I think?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Aight, all done. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)