Jump to content

Talk:Astrid Kirchherr/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Checking against GA criteria

[edit]

Notified: User:Andreasegde, User:Vera, Chuck & Dave, User:John Cardinal, WP:WikiProject The Beatles, WP:Wikiproject Germany

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • ref #8 [1] is dead; ref #9 [2] is dead
Done.--andreasegde (talk) 16:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  1. b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    • tagged and fair use rationales
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    All done, good work - keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll do it after Magic Alex is done.--andreasegde (talk) 16:32, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone through this with a fine toothcomb, and have cleaned, formatted and deleted.--andreasegde (talk) 12:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]