Talk:Atlético Madrid/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 19:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
This is a pretty good article, although there are far too much bare URL's and their are some sections of the article with little to few references.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Their are quotes that don't provide references
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Very good on this aspect
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I feel this is capable of GA status because it has good information and a good layout aswell.
The only problem I saw was References, these are bare URL's and their are not enough of them but this was the only problem, it seems you have went over the last review and improved the article. Nice work, Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 19:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Intertoto 2007
[edit]Atlético never won this trophy. Please see here. --VAN ZANT (talk) 10:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)