Talk:Audacity
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Untitled talk page discussion by 87.162.10.194[edit]
I'm not sure about the WP policy, but shouldn't the original sense (boldness) go first? I use the audio editor and like it, but I don't think it is more notable than the 500 year old, quite common word for a human quality it derived its name from.--87.162.10.194 (talk) 12:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- I decided to be audacious.--87.162.10.194 (talk) 12:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Chutzpah[edit]
Is it right to include this word as part of the definition? This is the english language page, and thus is not any other language definiton in the wrong place? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.225.255 (talk) 23:33, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- I think this word its pretty widely understood in the English-speaking world. - Ahunt (talk) 00:37, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- One of the beauties of the English language is its readiness to incorporate words from other languages. Chutzpah is a case in point.TheLongTone (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
I concede my ignorance of the matter, but on the grounds that the article is amended to state its common usage only as a written device. Any thoughts? 5.81.157.178 (talk) 17:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)