Talk:Back to December/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Novice7 | Talk 07:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Really good! Here are some issues:-
Lead
[edit]- Link country pop, singer-songwriter? Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- The song was written entirely.. — not "entirely", but "solely". Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Upon released as a promotional single — "Upon its release as a promotional single", would be better. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- although neither has confirmed nor denied these allegations — neither of whom? Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- The song was a "big" success in United States — try "The song was successful in 'the' United States.." Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- "Swifts performed 'Back to December'" in a series.. — "Swift has performed.." typo "Swifts" → "Swift". And series? Remove "series of" and add some other word instead of series. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Background
[edit]- Back to December addresses a first for Swift, in that she had never apologized to someone in a song before. — reword.
- I reworded it into ""Back to December" is an apology to a former lover in the form of a song, something that she has never done before" Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- "According to Swift, the lyrics were written as an apology to a former boyfriend, commenting.." — Split the sentence after comma. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Based in certain aspects of the song's lyrics, like the time line and some physical descriptions — I didn't get that.
- Already reworded into : "Based from the lyrics, critics have speculated that ..." Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe you should re-title it to "Background and release" Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Composition
[edit]- "the other song is Haunted" — change to 'the other being "Haunted". Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- You typed "apologize" here, but in Background it is "apologise". Be consistent.
- I changed it and used "apologize". Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Lyrically, it is about somebody who was incredible to her, just perfect to her in a relationship, and she was really careless with him, so these are the words that she would say to him that he deserves to hear. — change that sentence.. Seems there are too much commas. Try splitting. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- "the song's couplets" — needs a "writing" or "noting" after couplets.
- I paraphrased the sentence. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Critical reception
[edit]- Roughstock gave the song four stars — out of how many stars?
- Out of five. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- praised repeats. Try "complimented" or "lauded" Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Entertainment Weekly review was already mentioned in Composition. Remove that. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Chart performance
[edit]- "number six on the Billboard Hot 100 due to of sales of" — due to "of"? Remove "of". Also, maybe "Billboard Hot 100 with sales of"? Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- A comma is needed after downloads on Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- In its sixth week, it has climbed to number forty-three — Maybe, "the song has since reached a position of number forty-three"? Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Internationally, the song "has" moderate success — "has"? Maybe "has had" Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- a "the" is needed before Canadian Hot 100 Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Live performances
[edit]- Swift first performed "Back to December" on October 18, 2010, in Paris at a showcase — rearrange . First venue, then date. Done
- "set to release on the October.." — "set for release on October.." Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Next sentence also same as first. First event, then details. Like, "Swift performed the song on (the event's name), (details like what is it), which was streamed... Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Swift also performed Back to December on several occasions. — "on several other occasions". Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- "as B+ in the Los Angeles Times" — "a B+ by the Los Angeles Times". Also, not "noted", but "noting" Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Is it a mashup or a medley?
- My mistake. It's a medley, not a mashup. Already fixed. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Same with LA Times. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- "Following promotion" — remove that. And, change to "Swift also performed" Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Track listing
[edit]- The EU track list is a duplicate of the US. Remove that. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Charts
[edit]Good
Release history
[edit]Good
Media
[edit]- Why don't you link a sample?
- I already uploaded 34 second sample of the song and added it in the article. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- No... Reduce its length. Maximum for Back to December is 30 seconds (per WP:SAMPLE). Novice7 | Talk 12:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Alright. Fixed. I shortened it to 22 seconds. Done— MyDecember (talk) 13:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- No... Reduce its length. Maximum for Back to December is 30 seconds (per WP:SAMPLE). Novice7 | Talk 12:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- I already uploaded 34 second sample of the song and added it in the article. Done — MyDecember (talk) 12:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Links and references
[edit]- No DAB
- No Dead Link
- Very good! Putting "On Hold" Novice7 | Talk 08:57, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Pass! Novice7 | Talk 14:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Very good! Putting "On Hold" Novice7 | Talk 08:57, 15 December 2010 (UTC)