Talk:Baltimore railroad strike of 1877/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 17:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Nicely done. You are missing a foot note in the 6th Regiment section.
- I fixed a broken sentence toward the end. see here
- Let me know when you've added the citation in and I'll check the images and pass. auntieruth (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- @Auntieruth: I'm not sure what footnote you are referencing that is missing, and also do you mean in inline citation or a note? TimothyJosephWood 02:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Reping @Auntieruth55:. TimothyJosephWood 02:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- All is good now! :) Passed. Nicely done. auntieruth (talk) 13:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Reping @Auntieruth55:. TimothyJosephWood 02:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)