Talk:Battle of Great Bridge/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
The bit with the contrasting quotes from Dunmore and Washington doesn't flow well. The Dunmore quote, in particular, seems to come from out of nowhere. Perhaps they should be put together in their own paragraph with some additional material to provide context.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Some references need place of publication
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Thanks for taking the time to review this. I believe I've addressed your concerns; let me know if not. Magic♪piano 13:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say I saw the review & saw your efforts to improve the article; you've a pretty good way of making the paragraphs go smoothly, and your responsive to the advice he gave you (moving the quote). Good job, for whatever my opinion is worth. Ebanony (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good word! Magic♪piano 16:26, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]