Talk:Battle of Schliengen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

review

• The placement of some of the pictures leaves large patches of white spaces on my browser. This doesn't look nice. Can you improve?
  • I have no idea how to do this. Auntieruth55 (talk)
    • moved images. See if that's better. Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
      • actually no it didn't improve. I tried something using the {{FixBunching}} template. Now it looks good to me please check.
        • I don't see any difference, so I guess it worked. :)
• "The mountains in the vicinity [of Mullhaus] are bold" I assume you mean Mulhouse?
  • Müllheim. Done
    • The respective quote still mentions Mullhaus. So is it Mulhouse or Müllheim?
      • It is Müllheim,
• "Sutzenkirchen"??? I couldn't find that place anywhere. There is a place called Sitzenkirch near Kandern which could be the place you refer to.
  • Yes. fixed. Done
    • I'm confused. You linked Sitzenkirchen while I still think Sitzenkirch is a better choice. done
• "Feldberg", I linked Feldberg but it is ambiguous but I think it should be Feldberg, Baden-Württemberg, correct?
  • No, there is no article on the place. It's a fleck. I've added coordinates. Done
• You state losses of 1,200 and 800 men respectively in the info-box. I can't find a citation for this information. The only reference to casualties is in the Aftermath section.
  • I'll add a cite. Done
• Fix dashing on "The History of the campaign of 1796 in Germany and Italy, p. 122-23." and "The History of the campaign of 1796 in Germany and Italy, pp. 123–24." Notice the two types?
  • Yes, will fix. Thanks. Done Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
• "It was crossable only at certain places: Kehl, by Strasbourg, and Hüningen, by Basel, where systems of bridges and raised roads made access reliable." not cited
• "(altitude 755 feet (230 m))" looks a bid odd with two closing brackets. Do you think it would look better with —(dash)ing? reworded to fix. Cite added Auntieruth55 (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Pass Looks good to me now. Well done MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)