Talk:Battle of Worringen

Military history: Dutch / European / Medieval Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

no fancy stats table?

it's a wikipedia page about a battle - it needs a table! pauli 02:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

city rights for Düsseldorf?

It should be mentioned that another reason for the battle was the claim of city rights of the city of Düsseldorf. Düsseldorf gained city rights in 1288 after the battle.

One of the largest battles of the Middle Ages?

Is this right? With c.4000 combatants each side, it's pretty small compared to Mohacs, Lechfeld, Grunwald, off the top of my head. Kisch (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and changed from "largest" to "larger". ASchudak (talk) 10:13, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]