Talk:Be At TV
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
I saw this item is marked for deletion with reason: "The references given show only passing mentions; I cannot find significant coverage of this subject in reliable independent sources, therefore it does not meet the notability guidelines" There is coverage of the subject at different reliable sources, like BBC.co.uk: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/7977510.stm Creamfields.com (the organisation behind Cream's Creamfields): http://www.creamfields.com/?p=3051 The London Paper: http://www.thelondonpaper.com/going-out/whats-new/get-ready-to-rave-it-up-at-home-with-be-at-tv Appscout: http://www.appscout.com/2009/03/be_at_tv_brings_the_party_to_y.php Trance.nu (backed by Armin van Buuren) http://trance.nu/v4/news/be-at-tv
The website is up and running, has a facebook account, is being mentioned on Twitter (Sander Kleinenberg, Carl Cox, Sander van Doorn, Armin van Buuren, Ferry Corsten and many others). I really don't understand the 'missing significant coverage by reliable independent sources'.
TIA Floris / Floor-is 213.93.224.154 (talk) 20:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)