Jump to content

Talk:Bhutan at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 08:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.

Capitalize Games: Summer Olympic games between

So it matches the first half of the sentence, include Brazil at the end of it: ...in Rio de Janeiro.

Changed to competed: Bhutan would compete at the...

Capitalize Games: India preparing for the games

As of right now there is one time summer should be capitalized and six times games should be capitalized.


1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.
@Kees08: All the fixes mentioned above have been actioned. MWright96 (talk) 08:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Found a couple more for you to fix, then we should be good to go.

Easy review, good job. Kees08 (talk) 02:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]