Talk:Bill Nye/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 11:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article has large chunks of text taken from this source; this is a copyright problem. The text should be removed and replaced with material from other sources. That source dates to October 2015, and does not appear to be a mirror of Wikipedia.

I don't think it is possible to fix this in the time frame of a GA review but will wait for a response before I fail this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike Christie, can you specify which parts of the article look suspicious?--The lorax (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Earwig analysis highlights the similarities. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:34, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I made an effort to remove much of these similarities. Does that look better?--The lorax (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The lorax: I haven't looked, but I just realized that I should also have said I don't think it's a reliable source. Sorry; I hope you haven't wasted your time with those edits. I remembered after I saw your note here that it's a wiki, and usually those aren't reliable. If you can show it's reliable, then I'll take a look at the edits. If not, I'm afraid it'll have to be resourced. My apologies for not saying this up front -- it slipped my mind. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like every reference is a reliable source, unless I’m missing something?The lorax (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I meant the dancingwiththe stars overlap, but I was misremembering; it looks like it wasn't used as a source. Sorry about that -- I promise to be more careful for the rest of this review. Yes, the overlap with that page is now fixed; Earwig still complains but the overlap is now quotes or phrases that are hard to change, so it's OK. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll copyedit as I go; please revert as needed.

What makes the following reliable sources?
- reviewgeek.com
- mentalfloss.com
- splitsider.com
- tvtropes.org (see this)

✅ Cut out all of those, but kept the Splitsider reference, which I'd argue is a reliable news source with an editorial staff per this Nieman Journalism Lab article.--The lorax (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not an issue for GA, but you may wish to fix the following dead links [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5].

✅Swapped or removed links.

Nye entertained audiences with kooky demonstrations like what happens when you eat a marshmallow that's been dunked in liquid nitrogen: I'd cut "kooky"; a bit too colloquial to be encyclopedic voice.

✅Swapped with "comical."--The lorax (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are some unsourced sentences in the "Other media appearances" section, and another in the "Science advocacy" section.
Do we really need to know he supported the reclassification of Pluto as a dwarf planet?
Nye stated "compared to all of the other herbicides, Glyphosate is pretty benign... there's no difference between allergies among GMO eaters and non-GMO eaters... organic farming takes a lot more water... I've changed my mind about genetically modified organisms": the quote is odd; why are we including references to glyphosate and organic farming? The context is just Nye's support for GMOs.

✅Fixed.--The lorax (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The science advocacy section has a bit of a proseline problem, with short paragraphs. This is good enough for GA, but if the material can be integrated a little more it would make it more readable. This is also a bit of an issue in the "Other media appearances" and "Personal life" sections.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TV Tropes is an usergenerated website so probably not suited as a source for a GA. Disclaimer: I am a member of the staff there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The lorax: the above are all fixed except for the proseline and the uncited sentences. The prose is good enough for GA, which only requires clear and concise -- I just mentioned it as a possible place to improve the article. Once the uncited sentences are cited I will promote this to GA. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:42, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie: I think all of the sentences in that section are cited now, unless I missed one?--The lorax (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, everything looks good now. Promoting. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.