Talk:Billy Cannon/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  22:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "and he was named the game's most valuable player" - not sure if this needs to be capitalised as I've seen it capitalised before

   " played linebacker for Texas A&M" - played as a linebacker?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article is well written, comprehensive and well-referenced. I couldn't find anything wrong with it, so promoted JAGUAR  14:33, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, that went smoother than I expected. I'm also not sure about "most valuable player." I'll just leave it as is for now. Lizard (talk) 20:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)