Talk:Bradley's regress
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How is this relevant to anything?
[edit]The content of "Bradley's regress" is extremely childish, and I argue that Wikipedia should not contain nonsense like that. For example, in the context of mathematical relations, or in any natural philosophical relation, "Bradley's regress" would be a brain dead idea. 87.93.172.32 (talk) 13:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)