Talk:Brazilian monitor Pará/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 07:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- 'The monitor had to be beached after passing the fortress to prevent her from sinking.' - What damage was inflicted to her to require this?
- Not specified. Tamandare took over 120 hits so I expect that it was damage from the Paraguayan guns.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- 'The monitor had to be beached after passing the fortress to prevent her from sinking.' - What damage was inflicted to her to require this?
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I've got a single question for you to answer, and then I can pass this baby. Skinny87 (talk) 07:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)