Talk:Buddhism and artificial intelligence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expansion[edit]

Hi please feel free to suggest any idea that could improve this page Jlkzhou (talk) 15:30, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am just happy that this issue is *finally* being addressed on Wikipedia, which means it has reached a key threshold in Buddhism. After many years of most Buddhist teachers dodging the issue except in rare circumstances, they can't anymore. Buddhism in the West is still primarily led by the Boomer generation, who are not necessarily up to speed on developments in tech, so the neglect of the issue is somewhat understandable, but now, they're going to have to get up to speed.

The power of AI has increased to the point where Buddhist teachers can no longer pretend it isn't going to challenge certain aspects of Buddhist philosophy and indirectly drastically affect Buddhism in terms of its skillful means - AI will lead to breakthroughs in neuroscience and in finding the most efficient path to enlightenment for different personality types. I'm curious to see just how long the most stubborn teachers will hold out ;) 76.71.47.3 (talk) 02:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

This article contains multiple NPOV violations. Much of it is speculative, original research and argumentation from the editor. Sources are often lacking or do not support the text. Many examples of a single (often controversial) source used to denote broad consensus from the field. I have already edited some of the offending sections, but I thought it best to note here as well. I appreciate the efforts of the editor. There is some useful, encyclopedia-level information here. However, I recommend the page be reduced to a stub and rewritten. ThingsAreOK (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]