Talk:CafeMom
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Now Owned by Rock You
[edit]I’m a bit scared to edit the page but CEO Michael Sanchez sold CafeMom & all their associated websites to Rock You & now only runs CafeMedia aka AdThrive
https://www.adexchanger.com/publishers/cafemedia-sells-websites-to-focus-on-adthrive/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruthlily (talk • contribs) 19:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Reads like an advertisement
[edit]Request for article Cafemom to be re-evaluated. The article is no longer a blatant advertisement for CafeMom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverring87 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Look at an article on the site. Many of them aren't even real -- they're advertised, but when you click on the link to read the "full story," you'll get a paragraph of semi-related content (not the promised article) and pages and pages of advertising. What's described in this article is not what the site really is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.225.71.167 (talk) 14:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Apologises for not signing. Silverring87 (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
This still reads like an advertisement. I know little about this website so I can't really help but this leads the reader to believe that the content is either copied from promotional materials or an unsubtle attempt to market via Wiki. Auronrenouille (talk) 04:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Seems this needs to be rewritten as it does read as an advertisement. ThurstonHowell3rd (talk) 00:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Clarity and commas
[edit]Highlights from this article include: "Members of CafeMom users can meet other mothers online, such as JonJon." Who is JonJon? What? "Anyone can join CafeMom and become a member as long as they are not a dad." Interesting. I think it's just all men, by the way—just whichever mom wrote this section only sees the world in terms of moms and dads. I also suspect it was largely written by one person, as the same comma errors are present pretty much throughout the article. 75.64.211.150 (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2015 (UTC)