Talk:Can I Get It/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Ippantekina (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 13:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a quick query: the infobox says it was a promo single with a release date (24 November 2021), but the prose mentions nothing about this. May I know the reason? Ippantekina (talk) 13:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some IP must have added that and it skipped my mind to change it. Thanks for taking up this review. I'll address all the comments upon the review's completion, if that is okay with you.--N Ø 14:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lead and infobox

Please resolve the promo single issue that I raised.
Do we have a YouTube URL to the audio/lyric video, if possible?
"They deemed it an outlier on 30 whose brazen pop production catered to the tastes of mainstream radio" unclear; so is this song or 30 catered to mainstream radio, according to critics?
"The release of "Can I Get It" was not supported by any live performances." redundant

Background

Great.

Composition

Do we have information about the studios where the song was recorded/mixed/engineered etc.?

Critical reception

I have encountered some opinions that saying a song received positive/mixed/negative reviews without providing a source is a case of WP:SYNTH. I am neutral towards this, but keep this in mind for future articles if someone else raises this concern.
"the song's optimism and whistled portion made it sound "out of place" " we should discuss the overall tone of 30, either here or in the Composition section, to shed light on how the "optimism" contrasts with the album
"Adele's hushed moans construct a sultry atmosphere" this reads better in the Composition section imo.

Commercial performance

Great.

Credits

Great.

Charts

Great.

References

Great.

Overal

Well written and thoroughly researched, though I have some minor concerns for the prose per above. Although this song is only covered by sources that are album reviews, its impressive chart stats including top-20 placements in many countries make it pass general notability. Putting this on hold for seven days. Ippantekina (talk) 02:14, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the review, Ippantekina. I believe everything is addressed.--N Ø 06:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.