Talk:Canon EF 100mm lens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Photography  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The optical formula did not change between incarnations.[edit]

I've heard this several times, but not from a definitive source; this is why I put a cite needed tag in the article. It makes sense that a different type of focus motor shouldn't affect the optics, and that Canon ( or anyone else ) wouldn't invest R&D in developing a new optical formula if it isn't needed. Between this and having been told a few times ( at a pro camera store, online ), it passes my level of "probably true." Still, it needs a citation, and if anybody else feels like this doesn't pass the threshold, Wikipedia says to act bold and remove it.

Hopefully somebody has access to diagrams of the glass in both lenses, or can settle this somehow? ForrestCroce 03:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

The optical formulae of the two 100mm f/2.8 macro lenses are completely different. The old (non-USM) one extends while focusing and has 10 elements in 9 groups; the new (USM) one uses internal focusing and has 12 elements in 8 groups. Proof: (talk) 19:33, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

more illustrative photo?[edit]

hooray for squirrels photographed with macro lenses!

Image stabilization[edit]

on the right , Should be Yes/No given the new lens

Macro vs. non-macro 100mm lenses - this page either needs to be overhauled, or a non-macro page needs to be added[edit]

There appears to be only one page for EF 100mm lenses, and it's this one, which only deals with the macro lenses and pretends the 100/2 USM does not exist. Yet the links to the 100mm lens (both from the 85/1.8 page and from the Canon EF/EF-S lens listings) have separate links to 100mm and 100mm macro - both of which land on this page, whose title doesn't say it's only about macro lenses.

Can someone with access to suitable information, sample photos, etc. of the 100/2 perhaps resolve this? I don't have the resources I need for it. (talk) 19:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)