Talk:Capture of East India Company ship Nautilus

Military history: Maritime / British / European / North America / United States / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

United States: Military history / History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.

British Empire Low‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Asia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved to Capture of East India Company ship Nautilus. Unless the ship were captured another time, including the Peacock in the title seems superfluous, though there's no prejudice against a new request to mention it. --BDD (talk) 18:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Capture of HMS Nautilus → Capture of East India Company ship ''Nautilus'' – Nautilus was an East India Company vessel, not a ship of the Royal Navy. EIC vessels were quasi-military, as they occasionally had to deal with pirates or privateers, but not warships. The present title of the article is incorrect, verging on POV. --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC) --HLGallon (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this only details part of the action, it should indicate both actors. Capture of Nautilus by Peacock or Peacock's capture of Nautilus or somesuch -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 05:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The use of quotation marks does not achieve the same thing in the title as it does in the text of an article. I suggest HLGallon renames the suggested new title to simply Capture of East India Company ship Nautilus. The italics can be achieved by using Template:DISPLAYTITLE. Brigade Piron (talk) 12:34, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, some useful suggestions, but as nobody is questioning the basic premise for the move, I will proceed with it. HLGallon (talk) 20:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your new name still only addresses half the situation, missing the Peacock. -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 10:27, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: More input would help. And per WP:RMCI, the nominator should await the closure of the discussion by an uninvolved editor.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. The question is to weigh precise vs. concice. Most wp:concise: Capture of Nautilus. Most wp:precise: Capture of East India Company ship Nautilus by USS Peacock. ^walk victor falk^talk 08:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.