Talk:Caracal/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 21:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Immediate problems
[edit]Cleanup banners
[edit]This article does not need or have many cleanup banners, such as {{clarifyme}}, {{citation needed}} and {{POW}} tags.
Plagiarism
[edit]This article does not plagiarise. The images are also properly licensed.
References
[edit]The references are perfect. All paragraphs are properly sourced.
Images
[edit]The images are relevant to the topic and they have suitable captions.
Well-written?
[edit]This article is well-written. It contains perfect prose. It has a lead section and proper layout. The spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization.
Original research
[edit]This article contains no original research.
Coverage
[edit]This article is broad in coverage and goes into detail only where necessary.
POV
[edit]This article has a neutral point of view.
Stability
[edit]This article is relatively stable. There has been no edit wars, but there has been quite a few undos in the history of the article due to vandalisms. However, these are not large-scale, so I can summarize that the stability is good enough for this article to be a good article.
Overview
[edit]This article is ready to be a good article.