Talk:Charles Domery/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bencherlite ^Talk 19:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

An excellent, bizarre article. I dread to think of the BLP problems should a person with similar eating habits come to public attention now. Fortunately, BLP isn't an issue here...

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
No images, but unlikely to be any of him, and other images unnecessary
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
No problems here. I also note that a more experienced GA reviewer has also read the text and found only one minor quibble, which was quickly sorted, and a couple of points I made on the author's talk page were also quickly fixed. Excellent work. Bencherlite ^Talk 19:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]