Talk:Chess/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Article status
Are there any plans/interest to bring this article back to FA? It seems on first glance to have a solid enough foundation, and has interested editors working on it. Might be near GA level already Horsesizedduck (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly I think the frantic efforts to bring it back to FA status according to modern wikipedia standards were a negative for the overall quality of the article. Most of the GA/FA reviewers don't know much about chess anyway. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 19:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The FA review that led to delisting was in early 2021. While one editor was attempting to address the initial concerns, another editor started a major rewrite (in his own words, "I tried to start a rewrite of the article to try to repeat the salvation 10 years ago"), which completely disrupted the process of addressing the original concerns. Another editor wrote, "That pretty much sums up my decades-long frustration with this article." A "solid enough foundation" and "interested editors working on it" are not sufficient to achieve anything, if editors influencing the decision have their own ancient agendas. Bruce leverett (talk) 03:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Fivefold repetition rule
Why is it named fivefold and all the links send you to threefold? Am I missing something or should it be changed to threefold? MiniFlux (talk) 21:42, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- Fivefold repetition is closely related to, but handled differently from, threefold repetition. There is a brief section of the article on threefold where we define and discuss fivefold. It would be more helpful if the links for fivefold sent you to that section, rather than just the beginning of the article. Bruce leverett (talk) 15:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)