Talk:Chic C'est la Vie/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kncny11 (talk · contribs) 20:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


So, a fun fact about me: I got sick a lot as a kid (heart condition + nervous stomach), and so I watched a lot of reality TV between the years of... oh, let's say 2008 (when we finally took the plunge and got cable) to 2014 (when either my stomach sorted itself out or I just decided to suck it up). Anyway, because of this, I know way too much about and am a little too weirdly obsessed with the Kardashians and the Real Housewives. Also WWE.

Anyway, back to the review. Any section that you see marked with a  Working tag means that I haven't finished combing through it yet, but feel free to address comments as they appear! Kncny11 (shoot) 20:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede[edit]

  • The auto-generated short description calls this a 2021 single, obviously it's not
I believe I was able to manually change this. Thanks for pointing it out, lemme know.
  • "is a song" → "is the second career single" with the pipe
Modified; is it alright with you if I leave it out "career"? I'd prefer to keep up the continuity from de Lesseps' previous single's article.
  • "as her second one" → "as a follow-up"
Modified.
Linked.
  • "although some called it catchy" → "with some praise for the catchy refrain" with the pipe
Modified.
  • "The song's accompanying" → "An accompanying"
Modified.
Linked.

Background and release[edit]

  • Start by explaining the Real Housewives connection
I added some prose to this section; hopefully that satisfies your request
  • Pipe "single" in the body
Linked.
  • "third most purchased" → "third most-purchased"
Modified.
  • "becoming" → "which became" (redirects the subject; otherwise de Lesseps technically becomes her own second single)
Modified.
  • put "EP" in parentheses after "extended play"
Added.

Composition and lyrics[edit]

  • "relatively fast" compared to what?
I removed "relatively"
Linked.
  • "common time" → "4/4" (time signature of common time reads a bit awkwardly)
Modified.
  • replace hyphens with en dashes for the chord progression
Modified.
Modified.
  • You can drop The Real Housewives of New York City to just Real Housewives in the second paragraph
Modified.
  • "felt that these callouts"
Modified.
  • "on the other cast members"
Modified.

Critical reception[edit]

Linked.
  • "not taking it seriously" not encyclopedic, could also read as a subjective assessment (i.e. "aw, they don't get it, they're not taking it seriously")
Modified.
  • "In a retrospective review of The Real Housewives releases," → "In a retrospective review of all music releases from the Real Housewives franchise," and then cut the "franchise's" later in the sentence
Modified.
  • Small quibble with the BlackBook review: it's currently posited as "stunningly un-self-aware and over the top", but ultimately worth a listen, whereas the reviewer seems to say that the over-the-topness is why it's worth checking out.
Reworded.

Music video[edit]

  • "video was documented" → "video were documented"
Modified.
  • Countess should probably be capitalized, as it is a title
Capitalized.
  • "Delahaye panned the video and called it" → "Delahaye panned the video, calling it"
Modified.
  • Direct quote from Delahaye would be better here
Modified.
  • Drop the "To promote the video" part, it reads awkwardly
Modified.

Track listing & release history[edit]

  • This all looks fine!

References[edit]

  • Good job archiving all the sources!
Thank you.
  • The link in [16] (Vulture) is broken, it looks like the URL was entered 1.5 times
Modified. Thanks for catching this.
  • Mark the WSJ and Vulture citations with "|url-access=limited"
Modified.

General comments[edit]

  • Article is very stable (only one editor)
  • Earwig score looks good at around 20%, with those matches being proper nouns and one direct quote.
  • The photos look good and are relevant. I am worried about the sandwiching happening with the second image (of the other Real Housewives).

Sorry for the absence -- I had three final papers this week alone. Everything's been addressed, so I'm gonna go ahead and pass this! Kncny11 (shoot) 16:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.