Talk:Chromhidrosis

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Chromhidrosis.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine: Dermatology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.

Plagiarism

This article appears to be almost entirely stolen from http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic596.htm . Isn't plagiarism disallowed on wikipedia? It is nowhere near cited properly and is far from fair use. WP:FU for details. I propose this article's deletion for this reason unless someone chooses to update/modify it heavily. From the copyright notice at eMedicine:

Copyright © 1996-2006 by the publishers involved and WebMD, Inc.
All material on this server is protected by U.S. and international copyrights. Personal use of material is permitted for research, scientific and/or information purposes only. No part of any material posted on eMedicine may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, or redistributed for any other purpose without the expressed written permission of eMedicine. You may not modify or create derivative works based on eMedicine material.

--Jpp42 09:15, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since some of the article was apparently original text added by other editors, I've listed this page on Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2007_October_15/Articles instead of proposing it for deletion...hopefully this is the correct action. --Jpp42 09:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image taken from reddit

That and the picture is entirely taken from [1] without citation, or credit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.224.71 (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. --Bobak (talk) 03:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Untrue, citation is given on the image upload itself. Furthermore the uploader verified her permissions with via a private message which im told is insufficient evidence for permission. The Reddit user in question has since deleted their account so no further permission can be gained at this time.--Jamez1502 (talk) 11:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Id like to add here that whilst the decission to protect the page seems logical, I hardly think three edits in a day constitutes a "swarm".--Jamez1502 (talk) 11:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "permission" can't be verified on a single user's comment alone. It'd have to go through OTRS to be acceptable permission, or I believe the user could publicly post a message confirming it. Since the user deleted their Reddit account, the latter is probably impossible. It's a shame that the image can't get adequate permission since there's no other images of this condition on Commons. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I did in fact ask, in a separate message, that the user make a public post addressing the issue but unfortunately no relevant action was taken. It is indeed a loss, I've told the story on the deletion request on commons expressing that I shall therefore leave it up to the community to decide what is to be done. However I expect deletion will shortly follow.--Jamez1502 (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]