Talk:Chulip/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: H3llkn0wz (talk · contribs) 15:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Plot is lacking (what a weird thing to say for a video game article:) ); see comment below
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- "The objective of the game is to successfully kiss various NPCs" -- that is not directly related to the screenshot, it should say what the screenshot is of.
- Done — Hibana (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- "The objective of the game is to successfully kiss various NPCs" -- that is not directly related to the screenshot, it should say what the screenshot is of.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- I see talk discussion about genre, is it reliably adventure?
- Done I've added sources to the genre for both adventure and simulation. If this is insufficient, perhaps a renewed discussion on WP:VG talk page is in order. — Hibana (talk) 02:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Was there one? Anyway, I think this is sufficient. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 07:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done I've added sources to the genre for both adventure and simulation. If this is insufficient, perhaps a renewed discussion on WP:VG talk page is in order. — Hibana (talk) 02:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Plot doesn't explain game ending or anything related to the searching for pieces. Is the plot just a series of puzzles?
- Done I've done my best to summarize the plot, but this game is so wacky that attempting to explain precisely how these pieces are incidently obtained would appear very random and unorganized to the average reader. Let me know if I need to change what I've done, or please make a suggestion as to how I should do so. — Hibana (talk)
- "strengthening the hero's heart" -- does this refer to gaining more health?
- Done — Hibana (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Gameplay mentions hazards, but does not list any. What are the hazards of the game, do they make the player lose health?
- Done — Hibana (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
A few minor issues, but this looks fine for a GA. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)