Talk:Church of St Demetrius, Patalenitsa/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lead could do with a little expansion to more fully summarize the article, see WP:LEAD Done

   I made one minor copy-edit.[2]. Otherwise the prose is fine

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Article is sufficiently referenced. I assume good faith for the Bulgatian sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Enough detail to cover major points

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images licensed and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for the lead issue to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

   Just what was needed, I am now happy to pass this a GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for the review! I have expanded the intro per your suggestion. — Toдor Boжinov — 09:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)