Talk:Clairol

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lemon up

There should be a mention of the discontinued "Lemon up" shampoo from the 1970s in this article. — C M B J 22:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you stop makeing Vitapoint?? 86.185.0.162 (talk) 09:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Testing

Maybe this article should mention how Clairol tests their products on animals.\

(According to Peta's website (http://www.peta.com ), Clairol admittedly tests all of thier lines on animals, excluding Herbal Essences brands.)

I prefer not to use any Clairol brand because of their policy- if other consumers were made aware, perhaps they'd feel the same way.

(See PETA's shopping guide for caring consumers... http://www.caringconsumer.com/resources_companies.asp )

Clairol is on the "Companies That Do Test On Animals" list.

Corporate History

Have there been any updates to Corporate History since 2007? Tiyang (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

The page is really weighted towards the advertisements and I think it would be nice to add some more content. It is, after all, supposed to be about the company. Coralshin (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]