Talk:Classical liberalism/Archive 10
Appearance
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Bloomberg?
I have never one heard Michael Bloomberg referred to as a classical liberal. Is there really a good reason why he should be mentioned right at the start of the article? 78.149.94.157 (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Removed. A very out-of-place sentence, sourced to an opinion piece by a very non-classical liberal, who doesn't even directly call Bloomberg a classical liberal. –CWenger (^ • @) 22:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)