Talk:Coalition Chronicle

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

I believe that this article should not be deleted due to the fact that until its creation, no publication served the entire Coalition of countries deployed to the Iraqi theater of operations. This magazine has served, and is still serving, as both a way of getting information out to troops (not only U.S. but British, Polish, Estonian, Korean, etc...) and raising awareness about some of the missions and accomplishments that are taking place in Iraq. Among the many things that the Coalition Chronicle provides is a list and chart of the progress each month for the Coalition. I feel that this is something that is notable and should not be deleted. Sphufounder 14:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

The speedy deletion template had been reviewed and removed by the time you placed the hangon tag. There's no request to delete the page in effect at this time. Leebo ^T/C 14:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]