Talk:Collaborative leadership
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PerlaPerez1, Jackline75, Xnm2, Issac2209. Peer reviewers: Korina-NP, SpencerCard, SRS200, Jaredsheppard.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer review - Jared Sheppard
[edit]The opening paragraph needs some work, there is only one sentence.
The page feels a little over saturated with all of the bullet points.
Needs more organization and structure with the setup of the page.
Sources are good, one needs a little work.
Article is well balanced and has reputable sources.
Overall I would say to just work on organization and explain more on the bullet points,but also clean the page up a little.
Jaredsheppard (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Jared
Peer Review - Korina Palao
[edit]The definition could use a bit more elaboration. The "History of the Term" could maybe just be "historical background" or just "history". Also, the ending of that topic is sort of awkward, maybe elaborate before or after the quote. Like Jared said elaboration on the bullet points. The topics are very explaining, but maybe some sub-topics? Over all the article looks good. After some clean up of the article itself it will great.
Peer Review-Spencer Cardwell
[edit]I would elaborate about each section a little more, especially the first section. I would also restructure the Characteristics of collaborative leaders section.In my opinion it looks to much like a list. Other then these two issus the overall article is nicely done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpencerCard (talk • contribs) 19:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)