Jump to content

Talk:Connie Smith/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mr. R00t Talk 00:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Criteria

[edit]
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: The prose is a tad bit long. Otherwise good.
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: - Sorry for the delay.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Very good.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: In the musical career section there really need to be more images. Only three images in the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Found another image on Flickr. Mr. R00t Talk 00:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I do know that. I'm going to look around for free images of her. Mr. R00t Talk 17:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outcome

[edit]

I've added this to the GA list. I've added the template. It is now a Good Article. Mr. R00t Talk 01:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]