Talk:Consensus division

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Redundant term, turn into disambiguation page[edit]

Consensus division as used in this article seems to be completely redundant, I haven't the foggiest why Mark de Longueville and Rade T. Živaljević stuck it into their article which has an interesting theorem which sticking this in the introduction only detracts from. I was unable to find any other cites to the term as a synonym of fair division. However I was able to find another earlier use of the term as a type of way of deciding entitlement (fair division) which is really a part of cooperative game - it is something fair division doesn't cover but takes as a given. This other meaning is given in Impartial division of a dollar Geoffroy de Clippel*, HerveMoulin*, Nicolaus Tideman and it is equally lacking in references to it.

I therefore intend turning this into a disambiguation page and distributing the contents of Category:Consensus division. Dmcq (talk) 11:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dmcq. No objections from me. Best wishes, Robinh (talk) 21:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]