Talk:Corporatese

Text and/or other creative content from Corporatese was copied or moved into Corporate jargon with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Which articles should be included in "Category:Corporatese"? Please give your views. Biscuittin (talk) 21:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger

I think Corporate jargon refers mainly to unexplained abbreviations while Corporatese means replacing a short, clear, phrase with a long and obscure one. I don't think a merger is appropriate. Biscuittin (talk) 21:35, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The articles really should be merged. Nothing crucial here that is much different from Corporate jargon. Format (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articles are exactly the same. Even in the article Corporatese it says, "Corporatese is Corporate jargon" To have these articles seperate is truly silly. Mailman9 (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More importantly, the article doesn't give any evidence whatsoever that the term "corporatese" is an actual term in widespread usage, which would be the only possible justification for leaving it unmerged. —Merc64 (talk) 15:04, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]