Talk:Corrida de Cori/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 22:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- "5 kilometres (3.1 mi) elevation" either "in elevation" or "above an elevation of 5 "
- "The range together with several local volcanoes " -> "The range, together with several local volcanoes, "
- "the Plio-Pleistocene" vs " of Pliocene-Pleistocene" forgive my ignorance, but is this the same? The linking is different...
- Argentina–Chile border has an article, and it uses an en-dash too.
- "lava flows" link?
- Link lineament.
- "and ENE lineaments" what's ENE?
- "magma ascent" link?
- There isn't a link for this, but I've explained in the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- "primitive basaltic lavas" link?
- I can't find an usable definition of the term, so I've cut it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- "Imilac-Salina" en-dash.
- "15-20 mya" en-dash and link mya.
- "1-2 " en-dash.
- "basaltic andesites and dacitic ignimbrites and ended in the late Quaternary with basaltic andesites in form of cinder cones" link all these jargon terms.
- "aeolian activity" link.
- "hydrothermal alteration" link.
- "These Escorial lava flows are" repetitive.
- A lot of those terms I mention above appear to be linked, just not first time.
- "fumarole spires" link.
- "crustal origin" link.
- Rewrote this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- "fumarolic alteration" link.
- Recast this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- "at an altitude" elevation.
- "about 1,392 millimetres" "about" and then given to the nearest mm??
- Cut the "about", it's based on a weather station there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- "1976-1977" en-dash.
- "reported in 1976-1977" ditto.
- "p.190" it's normal to have a space between p. and the number.
- You sure? I don't think I see such a space frequently. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- I see a space everywhere. The {{citation}} templates put a space in after the p. or pp. It's absolutely the case. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man:Added it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- I see a space everywhere. The {{citation}} templates put a space in after the p. or pp. It's absolutely the case. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- You sure? I don't think I see such a space frequently. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- "pp.181-182" -> pp. 181–182
- "1976-1977" in ref 1 should use en-dash.
Lots of jargon makes this practically inaccessible to non-experts, and a few other formatting issues. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man:Replied and processed everything else. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)