"On the creation of Yang, Rhimes" write her full name as first mention in actual article. Also, Oprah Winfrey how is show important, who is she, explain it. "while also noting her weaknesses" remove also. Then, "New York magazine wrote of the character" huh? That doesn't make sense. Link eighth season in its first mention. Don't use curly quotation mark things, use regular quote marks, per the WP:MOS. Same goes for references. In the first line of reception, it goes straight to reviews. I'd like an intro quickly.
Rhimes name is given now. Oprah context. Why would I remove that clause? Yes, actually, it does make sense. The magazine wrote of her character.. S8 linked. MOS:PUNCT is not a GA criterion. Intro given. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
"New York (magazine)" it actually says that, remove "(magazine)" in references, ref 11. Use single quotes rather than double in references please. Regarding 2b, how is ref. 34 a reliable source
Magazine removed. MOS:QUOTEMARKS is also not a GA criterion. The website has been used in other articles, including GA George O'Malley. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
"The website has been used in other articles, including GA George O'Malley" isn't a good enough rationale, could have been added after review, reviewer could have missed it. Either way, it doesn't explain or have a good enough rationale for source. TBrandley 00:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
First of all, you reviewed George O'Malley. The website has a staff, and from scoping around the website, it appears reliable. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Yep, looks fine. If you do happen to run into more useful information, please add it though. :)